Sadakshari
Lokeshvara
gilt copper alloy with silver and turquoise
Western Nepal/Western Tibet
Khasa Malla, late 13th – early 14th century
height 44.7 cm – 17 ½ in
A large and
unusual Khasa Malla gilt copper sculpture of Sadaksari
Avalokitesvara of the 13th-14th century in the collection
of Sandor Fuss.
This is a fine
example of the fine metal working tradition of the Khasa
Malla kingdom, a tradition which flourished during the
thirteenth and fourteenth century. This tradition is notable
for its brief efflorescence – we only have firmly
dated object from the last quarter of the 13th century
to the mid-fourteenth – and for the mystery that
surrounds the dynasty who name we give it. The Khasa Mallas
were kings with somewhat contradictory origins and leanings.
As Indo-aryans who first used the language now known as
Nepali –the state language of the world’s
“only Hindu kingdom” – they were apparently
Buddhists who ruled an area containing both Tibetan Buddhists
and Brahmanical Nepalese.
The metal sculpture
tradition patronized by these kings has clear antecedents
in the Nepal valley techniques and sculptural characteristics,
but the tradition can easily be identified by certain
stylistic characteristics and traits that are uniquely
Khasa Malla. Among these perhaps the most prominent are
the habit of sharply delineating the joints of the fingers
on the back of the hand and the rough treatment of the
rear of the base of the sculpture. These stylistic oddities
are combined with other traits that are not necessarily
unique to the tradition but are usually found in the sculptures
– the use of gilt copper as the basic material;
a rice grain pattern in the hem of garments when such
garments are found; a pronounced beading on the lotus
base; and red paint applied to the back of the base of
the sculpture in some cases.
The Fuss Avalokitesvara
is unusual for its size and elaboration. At 17 inches
in height it is one of the largest Khasa Malla metal sculptures
so far known. An image of the Buddha, without base, in
the Peaceful Wind gallery collection is the same size,
while another Khasa Malla figure of the Buddha, also without
base, in the collection of the Patan Museum is somewhat
larger.
The name Sadaksari
Avalokitesvara, can be rendered as the Avalokitesvara
of the six syllables, a reference to the mantra “Om
Man padme hum” which is the mantra of this form
of the god. This form is not well known in the Kathmandu
valley traditions, but is perhaps the most popular Buddhist
bodhisattva in the Tibetan pantheon, where he, and his
mantra, are closely associated with the Dalai Lama, who
is considered his emanation. The figure has been encountered
previously in the Khasa tradition, including a delightful
miniature rendering in the Ford collection (KM fig 57)
and another slightly larger but example in a private collection
(KM fig 58).
In this sculpture
we can easily detect several of the identifying characteristics
of the Khasa Malla tradition. The odd emphasis of the
finger joints – found in no other tradition –
is visible in several pictures (CD 32, 33, 34). The red
paint on the back of the base of the sculpture, covering
the rather roughly finished and ungilt rear of the lotus
is typical as well (CD 38, 40). The black paint covering
the ungilt hair is also found in several other Khasa Malla
sculptures, but unfortunately is not clearly evident in
any of the published photographs. Another common Khasa
feature is the emphatic beading at the top and bottom
rims of the base. We see the same feature at the top of
the base in several of the figures in KM, including the
two Sadksari (KM 52, 53, 56-58).
This sculpture
is extraordinary for its elaboration and luxury. While
many other Khasa images are adorned with skilfully rendered
jewellery, in this example we see elaboration not encountered
elsewhere: the richly beringed fingers and the lovely
elaborate scroll-work beneath the lotus stand out. It
appears that the eyes of the figure are inlaid with silver,
something we have not previously encountered in Khasa
sculpture, although sculpture in silver is known (KM 33,
34). The size and luxury of the sculpture leads us to
speculate that it may well have been a royal commission,
but unfortunately the image is not inscribed.
back
|